Post by account_disabled on Dec 27, 2023 21:58:11 GMT -5
Atime of establishment of the legal regime of the lands. . Jurisprudence of other courts in the country The Alba Iulia Court of Appeal announced that it identified two decisions on the role of the Administrative and Fiscal Litigation Section in the legal issue that is the subject of the referral Decision no. of February and Decision no. of June through which contrary solutions were adopted regarding requests to annul some decisions of the local council issued in which certified the ownership of the private domain of the municipality of some lands subject to art. . para. from.
Law no. republished with subsequent Country Email List amendments and additions. Through the first decision it was noted that the legal situation of the lands covered by art. para. from Law no. republished with subsequent amendments and additions is the one provided by the provisions of art. para. of the Civil Code in relation to art. lit. bb from Law no. with reasoning that in this case it is not the acquisition of the ownership right over a land as a result of a vacant succession that is of interest but the legal regime of the property thus acquired since the same.
Legal regime also has the transmission in the basis of the law of state ownership of intravillage lands. Through the second decision it was held that the provisions of art. para. of the Civil Code and the legal regime of the land in dispute is the one regulated by art. of Law no. republished in the form from the date of entry into force of Law no. . The other appeal courts either communicated that they did not identify judicial practice in the matter that is the subject of the referral or sent decisions in which the legal issues that are.
Law no. republished with subsequent Country Email List amendments and additions. Through the first decision it was noted that the legal situation of the lands covered by art. para. from Law no. republished with subsequent amendments and additions is the one provided by the provisions of art. para. of the Civil Code in relation to art. lit. bb from Law no. with reasoning that in this case it is not the acquisition of the ownership right over a land as a result of a vacant succession that is of interest but the legal regime of the property thus acquired since the same.
Legal regime also has the transmission in the basis of the law of state ownership of intravillage lands. Through the second decision it was held that the provisions of art. para. of the Civil Code and the legal regime of the land in dispute is the one regulated by art. of Law no. republished in the form from the date of entry into force of Law no. . The other appeal courts either communicated that they did not identify judicial practice in the matter that is the subject of the referral or sent decisions in which the legal issues that are.
Glad to be here! Good to see the Feebus faithful have another place to proclaim their superiority! Or share more excuses.